The Inevitable Entropy of Logic

Do the brain wave frequencies associated with inductive and deductive logic produce a specific geometry? Moreover, does a system of logic reach a point of maximum capacitance to produce coherant thought, emotion, and action patterns?

The answer to the first question seems to be yes, generally, and the answer to the second question seems to be an astounding and fascinating yes. The implications for debt, or logic-based currency, are astounding. Beta brain waves typically associated with the cognitive function of logic — if A then B — exist in a band between 13hz - 30hz. Frequencies in the range of 25hz to 30hz, meanwhile, produce the cube formation assigned to earth by Pythagoras and associated with Noam Chomsky’s mapping of the mind’s language-agnostic syntactic structures. Syntactic structures are uniform trees upon which hierarchical systems of logic run. Ninety-degree successions of induction and deduction are a hallmark of this system and also its achilles heal.

The human brain is encoded to act on the basis of these decision trees, and yet there are a finite number of thought, emotion, and action combinations the model can accomodate. For example, the program could produce an idea such as, “eggs are bad for me be-cause they are high in cholesterol.” The emotion associated with this idea may be fear, and the action associated with this idea — taken as a belief — may be to stop eating eggs. Seven years later, a new study may reveal that eggs are beneficial for human health, be-cause they contain ‘good’ cholesterol. The emotion associated with this idea may be joy, and the action associated with this idea — taken as a belief — may be to eat eggs.

When enough of these combinations run through a finite and closed system such as time, a point of invalidation occurs. This point of invalidation essentially chops down one-half of the logic tree necessary to produce a truth in the fashion of, “if A, then B.” This degree of invalidation, akin to entropy, was typically not experienced in the span of a human lifetime. Humanity rather reached a state known in computer science as “combinatorial explosion.” This occurs by virtue of the exponential growth of potential logic combinations which accumulate in the span of a given life. Eventually, the program runs out of processing time, memory, or the energy to evaluate new choices.

Resonance and Ideologies

Now, however, the advent of the internet and explosion of artificial intelligence is accelerating the entropy of logic via a phenomenon known in structural engineering as resonance. All form vibrates at a specified frequency; when a form encounters a force carrying the same frequency, its vibration is amplified to such a degree that structural collapse may occur. When we apply this idea to thought forms charged with emotion, we can see how ideological wars may escalate so quickly.

The emotional charge of one belief results in an escalation of the emotional charge of another belief, when the two beliefs are held in the same frequency, such as that of fear. Estimations for common human emotions measured by Psychiatrist Dr. David Hawkins begins at 20hz and identifies the 20hz - 30hz range we’ve been discussing with the experience of shame and guilt. Frequencies above the 200hz range are associated with a thriving human being; anything below 20hz is near to death.

The collapse of one’s belief in this manner leads to a rapid onset of emotion, as the frequency which was contained within the belief — and held within the body — releases. When we experience resonance which amplifies a positive emotional experience for the body, a mind in-tune with the body may choose to run higher frequency programs which match the positive experience. We find this to be the case in life-changing circumstances, such as near-death experiences and other encounters with the miraculous. The explosion of high frequency energy leads to “harmonic cascading,” or release of structures vibrating at lower frequencies.

No matter the mechanism for full and complete entropy of the mind operating in logic, in the wake of the destruction, humanity will find itself asking: “What is true?” It is this question which leads us to the evolution in the human mind; the evolution of the human mind is to relate truth to tangible experience. Relationships would look more like, “I enjoy spending time with this person. I will spend more time with this person,” as opposed to “This person is my relative. I am supposed to like my relative because this makes me a good person. I will make an effort to spend more time with this relative.” Moreover, life decisions will look more like, “I am going to take a walk and tend to my garden this morning,” versus, “I am going to commute in my car to work this morning because I need to earn money in order to live.”

The basis for doing anything becomes the sensorial, or tangible experience. It is the sensorial, or tangible experience, which becomes truth. If one’s intention is to live, one aligns lifestyle activities which genuinely support health and well-being; if one’s intention is to experience joy, one aligns lifestyle activities to that which brings joy.